IRS Flaunts Recent Tax Court Victory in Microcaptive Arena
By: Heather L. Marello, Esq.
In a recent press release, IRS is again urging participants in abusive microcaptive insurance arrangements to cease participation in such transactions. This message comes after the Service’s recent win in the U.S. Tax Court in Caylor Land & Dev. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2021-30 (2021). This win marks the fourth major victory in this area, following the IRS’s victories in Avahami v. Commissioner, 149 T.C. 144 (2017), Reserve Mechanical Corp. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2018-86 (2018) (appeal pending at No. 18-9011 (10th Cir. Dec. 20, 2018)), and Syzygy Ins. Co. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2019-34 (2019).
IRS designated microcaptive insurance arrangements as listed transactions through Notice 2016-66, which requires participants to annually disclose participation in arrangements that are substantially similar to those described in the Notice on Forms 8886. IRS has repeatedly renewed its commitment throughout the COVID-19 pandemic to audit taxpayers and assess deficiencies against those who claim deductions from microcaptive transactions that are deemed to be abusive arrangements. IRS deployed twelve examination teams in January, 2020 to target enforcement on this issue, and the victory in Caylor will only embolden IRS in its enforcement efforts. While these efforts are expanding, the recent tax court decisions have also helped to more clearly define what constitutes an abusive microcaptive, which will help practitioners and taxpayers better evaluate the validity of their individual arrangement.
Andreozzi Bluestein LLP is experienced in defending microcaptive audits both administratively and before the U.S. Tax Court. If you or a client participated in a microcaptive arrangement and are being audited or would like to discuss whether you have a reasonable basis to claim deductions from a microcaptive insurance arrangement on your return, please contact the attorneys at Andreozzi Bluestein, LLP for a no-obligation consultation.
This communication is for general informational purposes only which may or may not reflect the most current developments. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or a recommended course of action in any given situation. This communication is not intended to be, and should not be, relied upon by the recipient in making decision of a legal nature with respect to the issues discussed herein. The recipient is encouraged to consult an independent licensed attorney before making any decision or taking any action concerning the matters in this communication. This communication does not create an attorney-client relationship between Andreozzi Bluestein LLP and the recipient.
Any links to other web sites are not intended to be referrals or endorsements of these sites. The links provided are maintained by the respective organizations, and they are solely responsible for the content of their own sites.